Thursday, September 24, 2009

Tax Money Funds Over Seas Abortions!

The Obama Administration gave $50 million to the UN's "Population Fund" which funds abortions in third world countries and countries like China where only one child is allowed per family and women are forced to have an abortion if a second child is conceived. Our tax dollars are paying for these woman to have mandatory abortions! "Their blood is on our hands!"

Check out this article for more:
http://www.lifenews.com/int1130.html

Thursday, September 10, 2009

Fight Abortion!

Don't let the Government Fund Abortions!
They will use YOUR tax dollars!
Fight Abortion!

Government-Funded Abortions - Graph


Healt Care Bill Update

(Expert from http://www.stoptheabortionmandate.com/)

"Last night, President Obama addressed a joint session of Congress -- and the nation -- about his plan for anational, government-run health care system, stating:"One more misunderstanding I want to clear up -- under our plan, no federal dollars will be used to fund abortions."This simply IS NOT TRUE! Even the mainstream media and respected fact-checking organizations are calling out the President on this misinformation.

Make no mistake about it: Abortion WILL be funded by the government through the proposed health care plan.For years, Planned Parenthood and the abortion lobby have been working towards the day when abortion would be included in comprehensive health care reform -- the day when abortion coverage would become mandatory and paid for with your tax dollars.Unless we act NOW, that day is here!If President Obama's proposed health care legislation passes, abortion providers will get their wish -- a multi-billion-dollar bailout, funded by the federal government through your tax dollars.Even as national polls reveal growing opposition to the abortion-laden health care reform proposals, new polling results released today show that the majority of Americans think it is WRONG for the government to pay for abortions and DO NOT want the government tofund health plans that fund abortions.We must redouble our efforts to stop the abortion mandate in proposed health care reform legislation.That's why we're inviting you to join pro-lifers across the country TODAY in the "VOID THE ABORTION MANDATE" virtual rally and grassroots campaign. President Obama and your representatives in Congress need to hear from you TODAY."

Here's what to do right now:
* CONTACT YOUR SENATORS AND CONGRESSMAN: Visit http://www.stoptheabortionmandate.com/ and click on the "voided check" image to send a clear message to your elected representatives that you don't want the government funding abortion

* SOCIAL NETWORKING ACTIVISM: Download the new "Void the Abortion Mandate" voided check logo and sample status message and post them on Twitter, Facebook, MySpace and other social networking web sites. Get them here: http://www.stoptheabortionmandate.com/

* GET THE FACTS -- HEALTH CARE REFORM FUNDS ABORTION: Having a hard time explaining how the proposed health care plan forces taxpayers to subsidize abortion? Get the new chart revealing the exact money trail: http://www.stoptheabortionmandate.com/

* SEE THE LATEST POLLING RESULTS: The majority of Americans think it is wrong for the government to pay for abortions and do not want the government to fund health plans that fund abortions. See the polling results released today at: .StopTheAbortionMandate.com

* SPREAD THE WORD: tell every person you can, and encourage them to take action at: http://www.stoptheabortionmandate.com/

We CAN stop this major power grab by the abortion industry -- if we act today and keep up the pressure on Washington.Thanks for everything you are doing to help STOP THE ABORTION MANDATE! For Life, Stop the Abortion Mandate Coalition http://www.stoptheabortionmandate.com/

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

Take Action!

Take Action Against Government Funded Abortions!
(http://stoptheabortionmandate.com/take-action/)
The current health care plan is a thinly veiled attempt to pass the cornerstone elements of the Freedom of Choice Act, which would ensure taxpayer-funded abortion.
But IT CAN BE stopped and YOU CAN HELP!

1. Call your Senators and Representatives and tell them you want an explicit exclusion of abortion coverage in any health care reform bill.
2. E-mail and Fax your Senators and Representatives and tell them you want an explicit exclusion of abortion coverage in any health care reform bill.
3. Meet with your Senators and Representatives at their district or Capitol Hill offices or confront them at a townhall meeting.
4. Write a letter to the editor. Tell your local paper that taxpayers should not be forced to pay for abortions.
5. Attend an event. Many organizations are hosting events on health care this summer.
6. Twitter and Facebook for StopTheAbortionMandate.com.

Talking Points to defend your argument:
(http://stoptheabortionmandate.com/prep/get-the-facts/fact-sheettalking-points/)
Government Run Health Care = Mandated taxpayer-funded abortion: A cornerstone of the Freedom of Choice Act will be a direct mandate under the new healthcare plan, forcing Americans to subsidize abortions.

Piecemeal implementation of the Freedom of Choice Act through healthcare legislation amounts to every American being forced to fund abortions, a mandate that every insurance plan cover abortion, and an increase in abortion clinics across the country.

Americans don’t support taxpayer-funded abortions. A recent poll in Ohio showed 70% of those surveyed oppose using taxpayer dollars to pay for abortions.

Under the healthcare plan, virtually every American will eventually be in a plan that includes abortion by requiring individuals to buy health insurance that meets minimum benefits standards determined by unelected government bureaucrats. If the law does not clearly state that abortion is excluded, abortion automatically becomes a minimum required benefit for all public and private healthcare plans.

If unamended the Obama healthcare restructuring bill will be the most massive abortion expansion since Roe v. Wade.

Empirical data shows that when abortion is a covered service, there are more abortions.
It is extremely unfortunate that at a time when American taxpayers are trying to stretch their dollar as far as possible as their jobs are lost, homes are foreclosed, food prices rise and the economy continues to decline, President Obama and abortion industry allies in Congress would mandate taxpayer funding of abortion.

Planned Parenthood, the nation’s largest abortion provider, received over $350 million in taxpayer funding last year and ended the year with a $112 million surplus. Washington has already mandated that taxpayers fund billions of dollars in bailouts and stimulus packages.
It is beyond the pale to now mandate that taxpayers be forced to bail out an abortion industry swimming in profits.

A majority of Americans (63%) support conscience protection rules, which protects doctors, nurses and other medical professionals should they choose not to perform a medical procedure, like abortion, which they are morally opposed to. No conscience protections are currently in the healthcare legislation.

Liberal Democrats and pro-abortion on demand groups are working furiously to exclude language that would ban abortions from being covered by taxpayers under the pretense of healthcare.

President Obama and liberals in Congress say they want health care reform, but they are using health reform as a way to ram through taxpayer funded abortion. Pro-abortion groups such as Planned Parenthood and NARAL have admitted they hope to mandate “access” to abortion for “all women” through national health care reform legislation.

Abortion is not healthcare, as the pro-abortion organizations would like Americans to believe, and it should not be mandated under any health insurance plan, especially one that Americans will be forced to subsidize.

Specific language must be written into the healthcare bill that excludes taxpayer funds from paying for abortions

Real Health Care Respects Life!

SIGN A PETITION to exclude abortions from the Health Reform Bill:
http://www.realhealthcarerespectslife.com/
Tell Congress to Keep Abortion out of Health Care:
https://secure3.convio.net/aulact/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=329
Ask Congress to Help protect Health Care Providers:
https://secure3.convio.net/aulact/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=190
Tell President Obama that you oppose FOCA:
https://secure3.convio.net/aulact/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=112
Watch this Video on Government Funded abortions:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_RD7hJhwy5g

If this bill gets passed, WE WILL BE PAYING FOR ABORTIONS! If ever there was a time to stand for your beliefs and fight for your convictions, this is the time! Fight Abortion! God have mercy.


Tuesday, September 8, 2009

Can Some Contraceptives Induce an Abortion?

Because I believe life begins at conception I cannot, in good conscience, support the use of any hormonal means of birth control.

"I feel chemical contraceptives have the potential to harm an embryo. And I decided based on moral and ethical grounds that I could no longer prescribe them." -Mary Martin, MD, Ob/Gyn, Midwest City, OK

At the risk of offending potential readers, I would like to begin by saying that I began this blog to share by heart. My honest thoughts and beliefs and I do not plan on hiding my beliefs or “sugar coating” them for fear of “stepping on toes”. However, I will say that everyone is entitled to their own opinion. I believe this with great fervency. I pray that one’s opinions are founded on truth and research, but I do understand that there are different thoughts and feelings on the topic and I want you to understand that I do not judge you for your decision on the matter. But the following excerpt on contraceptives is one that has become of great passion to me as I believe that many young girls and women are not being properly educated on the issue.

During my research on hormonal contraceptives, I was surprised to learn that this method of birth control CAN induce an abortion. I myself have been on "the pill" and I asked very direct questions to my health care provider about this possibility. I remember her assuring me that this would not happen as this is not how the pill is designed to work. However, upon further study, I have discovered that yes, this may not be how the pill and other hormonal methods of birth control are designed to work, but if the two primary methods of defense do not prevent conception (1.) inhibiting the release of a fertile ovum 2. Increasing cervical mucus), then the "fall back" comes into play. This third line of defense is to prevent an already fertilized egg from attaching to the uterine lining which is then simply discarded during the woman's next menstrual cycle. In some cases, these hormones may even dislodge an implanted embryo!

This information is difficult to locate. Many sources try and deny that this is a possible scenario. Yet, with diligent research, I have found multiple sources that support these findings and I encourage you to do your own research on the matter. Please take the time to research your birth control and any chemical that you put into your body for that matter. Not only for your health and safety, but also for the health and well being of a potential baby.

Below are some quotes from physicians on the post-fertilization effects of the pill:
"After reading [about post-fertilization effects] in several other books and papers, I realized I could no longer justify prescribing the Pill. I think most women feel life begins at fertilization. When they find out about the post-fertilization effect, they're surprised and some even rethink their decision." Cynthia Jones-Nosacek, MD, Family Physician, Milwaukee, WI

"We've known for a long time that birth control pills are abortifacients. Now it's finally catching on." Karen Brauer, M.S. R.Ph., Community Pharmacist, Lawrenceburg, IN

"I found out in medical school that they may prevent fertilized eggs from implanting, and I decided then that I wasn't ever going to prescribe them." JB Stanford, MD, University of Utah
(Quotations taken from: Post-Fertilization Mechanisms: What to Know About Hormonal Methods. http://www.contracept.org/postfertilization.php)

“According to the authoritative medical textbook, Contraceptive Technology, to make an informed choice, concerned women must be notified about the mechanism of action. Women need to know that "all regular hormonal contraceptives (the pill, implant, injectable) and emergency contraceptive pills," may prevent pregnancy by "inhibiting implantation of a fertilized egg." (F Stewart, J Trussell, PFA Van Look, "Emergency Contraception," Ch 12, In Hatcher et al., Contraceptive Technology, 18th ed, Ardent Media, 2004, p. 285.)

“The main way in which these forms of contraception {hormonal} are designed to work is by suppressing ovulation. The extra hormones also work to thicken your cervical mucus thereby creating a hostile environment for sperm. Both of these methods help to prevent fertilization {I’m ok with that part…but I struggle with the following…) If the other two methods fail and an egg IS FERTILIZED, then the Pill may work to thin the uterine lining thereby blocking the implantation of the fertilized egg” (FAQs about Hormonal Birth Control. 2009. www.epigee.org/guide/medfaq.html)

The same is true for the IUD device:
“How does it work? The copper IUD interferes with fertilization by keeping sperm away from the egg. If fertilization occurs, it will prevent the embryo from attaching to the uterus. The copper IUD also slowly releases the metal in the cervix which inactivates the sperm. The hormonal one works in the same way and also prevents the lining of the uterus from thickening, which makes it difficult for a fertilized egg to become implanted there.” (Women’s Health. 1999. Consumer Health Interactive. http://www.ahealthyme.com/topic/topic13096)

“The IUD may cause a low-grade infection in the uterus that prevents the fertilized egg from growing. The IUD may dislodge the fertilized egg or in some other way keep it from implanting and growing” (Family Planning Associates. Deciding About Birth Control. 2002. http://www.fpamg.net/gynservicesbirthcontrol.html)

Because I believe life begins at conception, I believe anything that would interfere with preventing a fertilized egg to implant or dislodging an already implanted egg is morally wrong and does in fact INDUCE ABORTION.

I do believe, as discussed in a previous post, that contraceptives and family planning are morally permissible. But, I also believe that there are some parameters that must be met when choosing a form of birth control.
Choose a contraception based on the following:
1.) ALL human life is sacred (Psalm 139)
2.) Human life was made in the image of the Creator (Genesis 1:26)
3.) Human life begins at conception (Psalm 139:13-16)
4.) We are responsible to protect human life (Exodus 20:13)
5.) Contraception must be determined by each individual couple and must be based on Scripture and God’s guidance alone and not by worldly standards (Romans 12:1-2)

When Does Life Begin?

I believe that life begins at conception! "For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother’s womb. I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made . . . My frame was not hidden from you when I was made in the secret place. When I was woven together in the depths of the earth, your eyes saw my unformed body. All the days ordained for me were written in your book before one of them came to be." (Psalm 139:13-16)

Science does not disagree with this fact. “Based on universally accepted scientific criteria, a new cell, the human zygote, comes into existence at the moment of sperm-egg fusion, an event that occurs in less than a second. Upon formation, the zygote immediately initiates a complex sequence of events that establish the molecular conditions required for continued embryonic development. The behavior of the zygote is radically unlike that of either sperm or egg separately and is characteristic of a human organism. Thus, the scientific evidence supports the conclusion that a zygote is a human organism and that the life of a new human being commences at a scientifically well defined “moment of conception.” This conclusion is objective, consistent with the factual evidence, and independent of any specific ethical, moral, political, or religious view of human life or of human embryos.” (When Does Human Life Begin? A Scientific Perspective. Maureen L. Condic, PhD. ; Senior Fellow; Westchester Institute for Ethics & the Human Person; Associate Professor of Neurobiology and Anatomy at the University of Utah School of Medicine. Salt Lake City, Utah. http://www.westchesterinstitute.net/images/wi_whitepaper_life_print.pdf)

"I have learned from my earliest medical education that human life begins at the time of conception. I submit that human life is present throughout this entire sequence from conception to adulthood and any interruption at any point throughout this time constitutes a termination of human life." - Dr. Alfred M. Bongioanni, professor of obstetrics, University of Pennsylvania

"It is scientifically correct to say that an individual human life begins at conception." Professor Micheline Matthews-Roth, Harvard University Medical School

"By all the criteria of modern molecular biology, life is present from the moment of conception." Professor Hymie Gordon, Mayo Clinic

"The beginning of a single human life is from a biological point of view a simple and straightforward matter—the beginning is conception." Dr. Watson A. Bowes, University of Colorado Medical School

"I oppose abortion. I do so, first, because I accept what is biologically manifest—that human life commences at the time of conception—and, second, because I believe it is wrong to take innocent human life under any circumstances." Dr. Landrum Shettles, pioneer in sperm biology, fertility and sterility, discoverer of male- and female-producing sperm

(Quotations taken from: When Does Human Life Begin?: The Answer of Science. Randy Alcorn. Eternal Perspective Ministries, Sandy, OR. http://www.epm.org/)

Monday, September 7, 2009

Family Planning

What about Family Planning? Is it “OK” to Use Contraceptives???
My husband and I have researched this topic in depth and have come to the following conclusion: That Birth Control (BC) and family planning are morally acceptable so long as it is used within the parameter of Biblical teaching and one’s God-given conscience.

Below are some excerpts from an article I came across discussing the topic of contraceptives and its ethical viability.

(Center for Reformed Theology and Apologetics. ISSUE: Is Birth Control Morally Permissible? Copyright © by Covenant Community Church of Orange County 1990; www.reformed.org)
Is Birth Control Morally Permissible?
"Many Christians simply offer blanket condemnations of almost any practice which is even incidentally related to these distortions. We must realize, however, that emotions which arise from such concerns may often cloud our ability to think through an issue clearly. As Christians, we want to be sure to decide any issue by the standard of God's Word alone.
Freedom of Conscience:
The Christian is free to do anything that is not contrary to the word of God. Scripture alone is the ultimate standard of ethical activity. God alone is the Lord of the conscience. Human commandments which are contrary or additional to God's word have no authority over the Christian conscience. Moreover, the Christian is free to do anything (not contrary to the word of God) because he or she knows that God's creation is good (I Tim. 4:4). Paul declares that "I know and am convinced in the Lord Jesus that nothing is unclean in itself"(Rom. 14:14).
Main Objections against Contraception:
1.) Contraception is Unnatural
Many object to contraception on the basis of its "artificiality." The general principle embedded in this objection is that we ought not attempt to hinder any natural course of events such as conception -- "Contraception is contrary to natural law."
In Response:
There are many things we do which go contrary to the "natural order" and yet are not immoral: e.g., shaving, airplane travelling, landscaping, driving, satellite transmitting, etc. …Furthermore, those who raise the above objection usually substitute some form of supposedly "natural" birth control such as abstinence or the rhythm method. However, it is absurd to refer to these practices as natural! Abstinence runs counter our natural sexual drives, and the intricate charting and scheduling involved in rhythm methods demonstrates that this form of birth control is far from "natural."
2.) Contraception shows a lack of trust in God
Opponents of contraception often claim that those who use it are simply acting out of a lack of faith. If they truly trusted God, they would allow Him to control this aspect of their lives.
In Response:
We are commanded to live our whole lives in obedience to and trust in God, and yet the Lord has given us certain responsibilities to carry out. When we trust in God for sustenance praying, "Give us this day our daily bread," we do not sit at home passively waiting for food to be dropped on our doorstep. Rather, we go out and work. If we were to ignore our God given responsibilities and carry the above objection to its logical conclusion we ought not ever work, use locks on our homes and cars, save money for emergencies, use brakes in our automobiles, wear safety goggles or sun screen, support the police or national defense, etc., but failing to do these things would be irresponsible. Such actions are Biblical, and so they cannot be contrary to trusting in God. The principles laid out in the main body of this discussion are an attempt to show that in some circumstances contraception can at times be another one of these areas of responsibility.
Neither of the above objections stands up to simple scrutiny. They fail to demonstrate that contraception is forbidden by the word of God. Many in our culture do abuse contraceptive measures (even some Christians), and abuses of contraception need to be properly distinguished from a Biblical understanding of the issues so that we may make a proper evaluation of the practice. The principles outlined above give us a start on this question, and so in light of the above Biblical principles, we can indeed conclude that certain forms of contraception under certain circumstances are morally permissible."

(Center for Reformed Theology and Apologetics. ISSUE: Is Birth Control Morally Permissible?Copyright © by Covenant Community Church of Orange County 1990; www.reformed.org)

I disagree with such opinions as the following official statement from the Catholic Church:
“Contraception is wrong because it’s a deliberate violation of the design God built into the human race, often referred to as "natural law." The natural law purpose of sex is procreation. The pleasure that sexual intercourse provides is an additional blessing from God, intended to offer the possibility of new life while strengthening the bond of intimacy, respect, and love between husband and wife. The loving environment this bond creates is the perfect setting for nurturing children. But sexual pleasure within marriage becomes unnatural, and even harmful to the spouses, when it is used in a way that deliberately excludes the basic purpose of sex, which is procreation. God’s gift of the sex act, along with its pleasure and intimacy, must not be abused by deliberately frustrating its natural end—procreation… The Bible mentions at least one form of contraception specifically and condemns it. *Coitus interruptus, was used by Onan to avoid fulfilling his duty according to the ancient Jewish law of fathering children for one’s dead brother (Gen. 38:8–10)… The so-called "individual conscience" argument amounts to "individual disobedience."
(Catholic Answers, "Birth Control" (El Cajon, CA: Catholic Answers, 2004) http://www.catholic.com/library/Birth_Control.)
(*Thought: Onan's sin was disobeying God, not "spilling his seed.")

I believe that the act of sex has more meaning and purpose than just procreation. There is an intimacy between man and woman during the “act of marriage” that brings a husband and wife closer together. If sex was only intended for procreation, then why is it permissible for a couple to engage in intercourse throughout any time in a woman’s cycle and not just at her most fertile times? Also, I think that intimacy would be interrupted if the couple is preoccupied with the possibility of always conceiving. For instance, if a couple has recently had a new baby and they are given the “ok” to return to their normal sex life, I believe that the intimacy would be strained if the wife feared another pregnancy so soon after giving birth. This definition of the Catholic Church also omits extreme circumstances such as those who are at risk of serious health complications either for themselves or the baby if they were to become pregnant or those who are infertile or post menopause. Should a couple who is infertile abstain from sexual intercourse because they are unable to procreate? I would think not. This is silly and even absurd. Yes, sex can lead to conception and it often does….hence the billions of people living on earth! And, the creation of a new life is a wonderful, beautiful, miraculous thing! However, I do not think that every act of intercourse should be intended to conceive a child and that the use of contraceptives is appropriate when used in a manner that is in accordance with one’s moral standards.

There are types of contraceptives that my husband and I have chosen not to use for one reason or another and I hope to expound on this subject in more detail in my next posts, "When Does Life Begin?" and “Can Some Contraceptives Induce an Abortion?” However, we also believe that choosing to plan our family by use of contraceptives is within our God given liberty and free will and that we are being wise to plan our family to assure my adequate health and ability to carry a baby to term as well as our capability to provide for any future children. We do strongly believe that we are trusting in God. We believe that God is sovereign and if God chooses for us to conceive a child, with or without the use of contraceptives, God will carry out His will.

“Mankind can thwart nothing that God wills to come to pass, artificial or natural.”

“God gives each couple the responsibility to determine how many children they wish to have and can provide for. God wants us to be wise and responsible in all areas of our lives”

“The use of birth control devices can be used for either good or evil purposes. The devices are not evil. The reason why the devices are used can determine if they are good or evil. If birth control devices are used for the purpose of prevention of a pregnancy for a person who wants to take sex outside of wedlock, it is the activity that is wrong and does not make the device evil. If the device is used within the context of a marriage for the purpose of being wise about childbearing, then it is being used for a good purpose. After all, if God desires you to have another child, even birth control will not stop Him.”
(Quotes from: What Does the Bible Say About Contraceptive? Open Arms Internet Ministry. 1998.
http://www.oaim.org/contraceptives.html)